 |
 |
|









 |
 |
|
136136 | You scored 136 on Emode's IQ test. This means that based on your answers, your IQ score is between
126 and 136.
Most people's IQs are between 70 and 130. |
In fact, 95% of all people have IQs within that range. 68%
of people score between 80 and 120. The following chart to your right, shows
these percentages and where your IQ score is on that scale.
Print your Certificate of Intellectual Achievement.
There's more to intelligence than a single number, a single score
or a single label. Emode uses four distinguishable Intelligence Scales in
the Ultimate IQ Test. By analyzing your individual scores on those four scales,
we are able to look beyond the raw IQ score into how your process information
and thereby determine your Intellectual Type. |
|
|
 | | You've
got a very experiential way of learning and a strong mathematical mind. You're
able to whittle even the most complex situation down to comprehensible component
parts. In short, you have mastered the art and science of precision. That's
what makes you a Precision Processor.
For you, life is a series of equations. Your brain is naturally
predisposed to intense mathematical acuity, and your understanding of numerical
problems is unparalleled. It's second nature for you to cut to the heart
of an issue, so that you can discover quick solutions to problems while others
get bogged down in unnecessary details. |
One Precision Processor that comes to mind is the Greek philosopher-mathematician,
Pythagoras. Pythagoras had a mind for numbers and, as such, could come up
with previously unknown theories like his method for calculating the sides
of a right triangle (a2+b2=c2). You too, can use numbers to translate aspects
of the world around you — something that doesn't come easily to everyone.
Your quick mathematical mind will allow you to communicate a variety of ideas
to other people, so don't keep it to yourself.
Precision Processors can apply their mathematical skills to any
situation involving numbers. That's a talent that will come in handy for
everything from the workplace to splitting a bill 12 ways to converting foreign
currency in your head. Others often look to you to do the math and luckily,
you're well equipped. |
|
|
Because of the way you process information, these are just some of the many careers in which you wcould excel:
- Scientist
- Mathematician
- Accountant
- Data Analyst
- Musician
- Astronomer
- Researcher
- Physicist
|
|
You've got tons of strengths. It wouldn't surprise us if you:
- Are resourceful
- Are detail oriented
- Are highly efficient & economical
- Are lightening quick with responses
- Think in numbers
- Are experimental
|
|
|
 |









 |
 |
Now let's look at the factors that contribute to you being a Precision Processor with a 136 IQ score.
Based on the results of your test, Emode divided your scores into four distinguishable
dimensions — mathematical intelligence, visual-spatial intelligence, linguistic
intelligence and logic intelligence.
Here's how each of your intelligence scores break down:
Your Mathematical Percentile  You
scored in the 100th percentile on the mathematical intelligence scale.This
means that you scored higher than 90% - 100% of people who took the test
and that 0% - 10% scored higher than you did. The scale above illustrates
this visually.
Your mathematical intelligence score represents your combined ability
to reason and calculate. You scored relatively high, which means you're
probably the one your friends look to when splitting the lunch bill or calculating
your waitresses' tip. You may or may not be known as a math whiz, but number
crunching might come a little easier to you than it does others.
This is the kind of question that helped to determine your mathematical intelligence score:
A boy is 4 years old and his sister is three times as old as he
is. When the boy is 12 years old, how old will his sister be? 16, 20, 24,
28, 32.
answer: 20. The sister is (3 )three times older than her (4) four-year-old
brother. Three times 4 is 12, in other words, when he is four, she is 12.
Twelve years old is 8 years older than 4 years old, which makes her 8 years
older than him. This never changes. Therefore, when he is 12, she is still
8 years older, or 12+8=20.
Like anything, keeping or improving
your math talents requires practice. Here are some everyday mental exercises
that could particularly helpful to you:
- Balancing your checkbook
- Figuring out your monthly budget
- Predicting what the change will be the next time you buy something
- Calculating your waitperson's tip in your head
|
Your Visual-Spatial Percentile 
You scored in the 80th percentile on the visual-spatial intelligence scale. This
means that you scored higher than 70% - 80% of people who took the test and
that 20% - 30% scored higher than you did. The scale above illustrates this
visually.
The visual-spatial component of intelligence measures your ability
to extract a visual pattern and from that envision what should come next
in a sequence. Your score was
relatively high, which could mean that you're the one navigating the map
when you're on an outing with friends. You have, in some capacity, an ability
to think in pictures. Maybe this strength comes out in subtle ways, like
how you play chess or form metaphors.
Here's the type of question that contributed to your visual-spatial intelligence score:
The answer lies in recognizing not only the visual sequence of a square
and then a line, but in the recognizing the solidity of the line in the first
example and the broken quality of the line in the second example.
Like anything, keeping or improving
visual-spatial talents requires some practice. Here are some everyday mental
exercises that will be particularly helpful to you:
- Playing chess, or video games like Tetris
- Studying maps and become the navigator on your next trip
- Sculpting or photography
|
Your Linguistic Percentile 
You scored in the 90th percentile on the linguistic intelligence scale. This
means that you scored higher than 80% - 90% of people who took the test and
that 10% - 20% scored higher than you did. The scale above illustrates this
visually.
Linguistic abilities include reading, writing and communicating
with words. Emode's test measures knowledge of vocabulary, ease in completing
word analogies and the ability to think critically about a statement based
on its semantic structure. Your score was
Here's the type of question that contributed to your linguistic intelligence scale score:
Inept is the opposite of:
Answer: Skillful.
The answer is derived by prior knowledge that "inept" means "unskillful" (Oxford Concise Dictionary).
Like anything, keeping or improving
linguistic talents requires some practice. Here are some everyday mental
exercises that will be particularly helpful to you:
- Doing crossword puzzles
- Start reading just for fun
- Befriending your dictionary
- The next time something breaks, try reading the instruction book first
|
Your Logical Percentile 
You scored in the 100th percentile on the logical intelligence scale. This
means that you scored higher than 90% - 100% of people who took the test
and that 0% - 10% scored higher than you did. The scale above illustrates
this visually.
Emode's logical intelligence questions assess your ability to think
things through. The questions determine the extent to which you use reasoning
and logic to determine the best solution to a problem. Your logic score was
relatively high, which could mean that when the car breaks down, your friends
look to you to help figure out not only what's wrong, but how to fix it and
how you're going to get to the next gas station.
Here's the kind of question that contributed to your logical intelligence score:
If some Wicks are Slicks and some Slicks are Snicks, then some Wicks are definitely Snicks.
Answer: False
The statement is false because while some Wicks might be Slicks, there is no conclusive proof that any of them might be Snicks.
Like anything, keeping or improving
logical talents requires some practice. Here are some everyday mental exercises
that will be particularly helpful to you:
- Trying some brain teasers
- Throwing away the instructions and relying on instinct to fix something
- Playing chess
|
For each scale, Emode determined
how many people received scores above and below yours. Your "percentile"
represents what percentage of people scored lower than you. In other words,
90th percentile means you scored higher than 80 to 90% of people did.
How are the percentiles determined? These percentiles were determined
based on the one million users who have already taken our test. We then adjusted
these percentiles based on a nationally representative IQ distribution to
make sure that no level of intelligence was over- or underrepresented in
the analysis. Thus, the percentiles we present reflect your score compared
with people in the United States in general. |
If your score isn't as high as you thought it would be, remember that
there are plenty of external factors that can affect your performance on
the test. If you were tired, hungry or distracted, you might have scored
lower than you expected because you were less able to concentrate.
Your level of formal education and your familiarity with taking
these kinds of tests also influence how well you do. That's part of the reason
IQ tests aren't a perfect measure of your intelligence. Your score would
probably be quite different if the IQ test was designed to take into account
your musical, artistic, emotional and social skills.
On their own, IQ scores can't predict someone's ultimate success
or definitive potential for success. Many of the qualities that lead to great
achievements are learned through culture, experience and schooling - not
solely from doing well on an IQ test.
What your IQ test can help explain, however, is how your brain
works best. By looking at the kinds of questions you answered correctly and
the kinds of questions you answered incorrectly, we can tell you more about
your intelligence type — the type that explains the kind of information that
makes sense to your brain. |
 |









 |
 |
Now that you know your IQ score, your Intelligence Type and your rank along
the four intelligence scales (Mathematical, Visual-Spatial, Lingustic and
Logical), we thought you might want to go back and see how you answered various
questions. People often waver on at least a couple of questions, so we've
provided the full set of questions along with the answer key.
= your answer
= correct answer
| 1. |
Which one of the five choices makes the best comparison? LIVED is to DEVIL as 6323 is to: |
| |
|
2336 |
| |
|
6232 |
| |
|
3236  |
| |
|
3326 |
| |
|
6332 |
| |
| 2. |
Which one of these five is least like the other four? |
| |
|
Mule |
| |
|
Kangaroo  |
| |
|
Cow |
| |
|
Deer |
| |
|
Donkey |
| |
| 3. |
Which number should come next? 144 121 100 81 64 ? |
| |
|
17 |
| |
|
19 |
| |
|
36 |
| |
|
49  |
| |
|
50 |
| |
| 4. |
Even the most ___________ rose has thorns. |
| |
|
Ugly |
| |
|
Weathered |
| |
|
Lonely |
| |
|
Noxious |
| |
|
Tempting  |
| |
| 5. |
HAND is to Glove as HEAD is to |
| |
|
Hair |
| |
|
Hat  |
| |
|
Neck |
| |
|
Earring |
| |
|
Hairpin |
| |
| 7. |
John likes 400 but not 300; he likes 100 but not 99; he likes 2500 but not 2400. Which does he like: |
| |
|
900  |
| |
|
1000 |
| |
|
1100 |
| |
|
1200 |
| |
| 8. |
A fallacious argument is: |
| |
|
Disturbing |
| |
|
Valid |
| |
|
False  |
| |
|
Necessary |
| |
| 9. |
If you rearrange the letters "ANLDEGN," you would have the name of a(n): |
| |
|
Ocean |
| |
|
Country  |
| |
|
State |
| |
|
City |
| |
|
Animal |
| |
| 10. |
NASA received three messages in a strange language
from a distant planet. The scientists studied the messages and found that
"Necor Buldon Slock" means "Danger Rocket Explosion" and "Edwan Mynor Necor"
means "Danger Spaceship Fire" and "Buldon Gimilzor Gondor" means "Bad Gas
Explosion". What does "Slock" mean? |
| |
|
Danger |
| |
|
Explosion |
| |
|
Nothing |
| |
|
Rocket  |
| |
|
Gas |
| |
| 11. |
If some Wicks are Slicks, and some Slicks are Snicks, then some Wicks are definitely Snicks. The statement is: |
| |
|
True |
| |
|
False  |
| |
|
Neither |
| |
| 12. |
Ann is taller than Jill, and Kelly is shorter than Ann. Which of the following statements would be most accurate? |
| |
|
Kelly is taller than Jill |
| |
|
Kelly is shorter than Jill |
| |
|
Kelly is as tall as Jill |
| |
|
It's impossible to tell  |
| |
| 13. |
A boy is 4 years old and his sister is three times as old as he is. When the boy is 12 years old, how old will his sister be? |
| |
|
16 |
| |
|
20  |
| |
|
24 |
| |
|
28 |
| |
|
32 |
| |
| 14. |
Assume that these two statements are true:
All brown-haired men have bad tempers. Larry is a brown-haired man. The
statement Larry has a bad temper is: |
| |
|
True  |
| |
|
False |
| |
|
Unable to determine |
| |
|
 |









 |
 |
| 15. |
Two girls caught 25 frogs. Lisa caught four times as many as Jen did. How many frogs did Jen catch? |
| |
|
4 |
| |
|
5  |
| |
|
8 |
| |
|
10 |
| |
|
15 |
| |
| 16. |
Inept is the opposite of: |
| |
|
Fit |
| |
|
Deep |
| |
|
Skillful  |
| |
|
Sad |
| |
|
Happy |
| |
| 17. |
A car traveled 28 miles in 30 minutes. How many miles per hour was it traveling? |
| |
|
28 |
| |
|
36 |
| |
|
56  |
| |
|
58 |
| |
|
62 |
| |
| 18. |
If all Zips are Zoodles, and all Zoodles are Zonkers, then all Zips are definitely Zonkers. The above sentence is logically: |
| |
|
True  |
| |
|
False |
| |
|
Neither |
| |
| 19. |
Sue is both the 50th best and the 50th worst student at her school. How many students attend her school? |
| |
|
50 |
| |
|
75 |
| |
|
99  |
| |
|
100 |
| |
|
101 |
| |
| 20. |
In a race from point X to point Y and back,
Jack averages 30 miles per hour to point Y and 10 miles per hour back to
point X. Sandy averages 20 miles per hour in both directions. Between Jack
and Sandy, who finished first? |
| |
|
Jack |
| |
|
Sandy  |
| |
|
They tie |
| |
|
Neither |
| |
|
Impossible to tell |
| |
| 21. |
Ten people can paint 60 houses in 120 days, so five people can paint 30 houses in: |
| |
|
15 days |
| |
|
30 days |
| |
|
60 days |
| |
|
120 days  |
| |
| 22. |
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never ________. |
| |
|
Complete |
| |
|
Accurate |
| |
|
Complex |
| |
|
Simple  |
| |
|
Wise |
| |
| 23. |
Which number should come next? 64, 16, 4, 1, 1/4? |
| |
|
1/16  |
| |
|
1/12 |
| |
|
1/8 |
| |
|
1/2 |
| |
|
1 |
| |
| 24. |
What number is one half of one quarter of one tenth of 800? |
| |
|
2 |
| |
|
5 |
| |
|
8 |
| |
|
10  |
| |
|
40 |
| |
| 25. |
A cynic is one who knows the price of everything and the ________ of nothing. |
| |
|
Emotion |
| |
|
Value  |
| |
|
Meaning |
| |
|
Color |
| |
|
Quality |
| |
| 26. |
Two cars start off at the same point on a straight
highway facing opposite directions. Each car drives for 6 miles, takes a
left turn, and drives for 8 miles. How far apart are the two cars? |
| |
|
2 miles |
| |
|
11 miles |
| |
|
14 miles |
| |
|
20 miles  |
| |
|
26 miles |
| |
| 27. |
Which one of these five things is least like the other four? |
| |
|
Coconut |
| |
|
Grape  |
| |
|
Banana |
| |
|
Apple |
| |
|
Pear |
| |
| 28. |
Wisdom is knowing what to do next; __________ is doing it. |
| |
|
Virtue  |
| |
|
Luck |
| |
|
Happiness |
| |
|
Sanity |
| |
|
Nostalgia |
| |
| 29. |
It is easier to _______________ than to offer a helping hand. |
| |
|
Raise a flag |
| |
|
Shout an insult |
| |
|
Lay down |
| |
|
Point the finger  |
| |
|
Sing praises |
| |
|
 |









 |
 |
| 30. |
True knowledge exists in knowing that you know ___________. |
| |
|
Everything |
| |
|
Nothing  |
| |
|
The truth |
| |
|
The weather |
| |
|
The meaning of life |
| |
| 31. |
Which word best completes the analogy: Water is to glass as letter is to... |
| |
|
mail |
| |
|
stamp |
| |
|
pen |
| |
|
envelope  |
| |
|
book |
| |
| 33. |
Which one of the designs is least like the other four?
|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
| 34. |

For the picture sequence above, find the picture that follows logically from one of the six below.
|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|
 |









 |
 |
| 35. |

For the picture sequence above, find the picture that follows logically from one of the five below.
|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
| 36. |

Fill in the empty box above with the correct picture from below |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| 37. |

Fill in the white box above with the correct picture from below |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| 40. |
Which design does not belong in this group? |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
= your answer
= correct answer
|
 |









 |
 |
The intelligence quotient (IQ) measures the ratio of a person's intellectual
age to his/her chronological age. Most adult intelligence tests are designed
for people who are at least 16 years old. For this reason, if you are younger
than 16, your Emode IQ score might be slightly lower than your "true" IQ.
One of the
first scientific investigations into the concept of intelligence, came from
nineteenth-century British scientist, Sir Francis Galton. Galton believed
that mental traits, like physical traits, could be inherited. He published
his ideas on hereditary intelligence in his book, Hereditary Genius.
Meanwhile in France, psychologist Alfred Binet was exploring ways
of measuring children's' intelligence. Like Galton, Binet was passionate
about testing and measuring human capabilities. Binet worked with two groups
of children - those who were average students, and those who were less mentally
capable. He discovered that average students could complete certain tasks
that less mentally capable students could not. Based on those findings, Binet
calculated the "normal" abilities for students within different age groups.
From there he could estimate how many years above or below the norm a student's
mental age was.
Just before WWI, German psychologist Wilhelm Stern came up with
an alternative to mental age for measuring people's intelligence. He suggested
that a more accurate method for assessing someone's intelligence was to measure
their capabilities given their chronological age. He proposed that for a
true estimate of someone's intelligence, researchers needed to calculate
a ratio between the subject's mental age and their chronological age. Since
the resulting numbers were represented by decimals, scientists decided to
multiply this "quotient" by 100 to get rid of the decimal places. Thus, the
formula for an IQ is: IQ = Mental Age/Chronological Age x 100.
Based on the ratio that Stern created, Lewis Terman, an American
psychologist at Stanford University, coined the term Intelligence Quotient
for Stern's Binet test scoring system.
IQ tests serve as a useful tool for institutions such as public schools and
the military, where great numbers of people must be processed quickly and
efficiently, and placed in appropriated classes or positions.
In the United States, kindergarten-aged children are often given
IQ tests to evaluate whether they need special attention or services. For
example, children scoring 130 or over are often considered "gifted" and placed
in programs accordingly. However, in most institutional uses of the test
nowadays, the importance placed on the actual IQ score has changed.
A widely-cited example of possible cultural bias appeared in the Scholastic Aptitude Test in the early 90s:
Runner: marathon
A) Envoy: embassy
B) Martyr: massacre
C) Oarsman: regatta
D) Referee: tournament
E) Horse: stable.
(Herrnstein and Murray, 1994) According to many, the answer, C),
is more likely to be answered correctly by upper class children (predominantly
white) because they are more inclined to know the definition of regatta. |
The military tends to use IQ test results to assess which field a recruit
might be best suited to. Instead of relying solely on the intelligence rating,
the IQ score, the military will now look at the kinds of questions a recruit
answered correctly. Once they know that, they have a better idea of what
innate skills the recruit can bring to specific assignments and duties.
And as far as the business world goes, uses of such tests for employment
purposes was declared illegal — except in rare circumstances — by the Supreme
Court in 1971.
In social life, the IQ test is only really applicable if you're
specifically joining an organization based on IQ scores like Mensa, a society
founded in 1964 for people who score in the top 2% of the IQ test. But, in
general, there are still some misconceptions about the importance of test
results. Chances are, people you know are more likely to be judgmental about
a high or low score than most institutions are. Luckily, this is usually
just a case of misinformation and is easily remedied.
| Robert Jordan, an applicant
to the New Haven, CT police force sued the department in 1997 after he was
refused entry on grounds that his IQ test score was "too high." A spokesperson
for the police department was quoted as saying people with too high of an
IQ "tire of police work and leave not long after undergoing costly academy
training." |
Much debate
circulates around the different IQ tests that are administered throughout
the country. Many researchers claim that the tests measure cultural knowledge
and understanding, not innate intelligence. Critics suggest that both IQ
and standardized tests are racially and culturally biased.
According to a 1996 report by the American Psychological Association,
"Intelligence scores partially predict individual differences in school achievement,
such as grade point average and number of years of education that individuals
complete.
Nevertheless, population levels of school achievement are not determined
solely or even primarily by intelligence or any other individual-difference
variable. Many differences can be attributed primarily to differences in
culture and schooling rather than in abilities measured by intelligence tests."
Outside factors, such as where you grow up, what kind of school
you attend, and how much school you attend contribute substantially to the
development of intelligences. However, it is not yet clearly understood what
those factors are, or how they work. It is widely agreed that standardized
tests, like an IQ test, do not accurately reflect all forms of intelligence.
Obviously, cultural knowledge, creativity, wisdom, common sense
and social sensitivity are not measured in IQ tests, but they certainly contribute
to a person's intelligence.
Still, there are some people who feel strongly that IQ tests are
the best way to predict future performance at work and in school. They feel
that IQ tests are better predictors of future success than even trained personnel
experts.
Experts have numerous theories when it comes to explaining, defining
and predicting intelligence. Some claim that intelligence is innate and fixed
and can be measured with clearly defined statistical methods. Others claim
that experience and environment affect intelligence - that intelligence is
the composite of many different talents and abilities which continue to improve
over time.
Three researchers have made significant advances in this field in recent years:
1. Robert Sternberg - Has proposed three sub-theories of
intelligence: context, experience, and the cognitive components of information
processing. In short, intelligence involves either adapting to your environment,
moving to another more appropriate environment or changing your environment.
Your level of experience with the activities or knowledge being tested gets
reduced to intelligence, but intelligence is best measured out of context
— when you perform unfamiliar tasks.
2. Howard Gardner - Has proposed his "Theory of Multiple
Intelligences" where there are seven independent but related intelligences:
logical-mathematical, linguistic, musical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal
and intrapersonal. Gardner is one of the biggest proponents for developing
new methods for testing intelligence. He speculates that intelligence is
culturally and experientially based. One's experience will influence how
much each of these can be expressed.
3. John Horn - Horn had proposed that there are two factors
to intelligence: fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence. Fluid
intelligence is one's ability to reason and solve problems in novel or unfamiliar
situations. Crystallized intelligence is the extent to which an individual
has attained knowledge of her culture.
In general, recent research has focused on intelligence as something
that can be changed — not as something that is fixed in childhood and as
something culturally and experientially based. Most current researchers agree
that there are multiple forms of intelligence, although there is no consensus
on how many. |
 |









 |
 |
Over the last two years, Emode's psychologists developed this IQ test using
proven, high-quality IQ test questions such as those in the Mensa Workout
tests and the Shipley Institute of Living Scale — an intelligence test that
focuses on both vocabulary and verbal abstract reasoning. Those are the skills
that are associated with problem-solving ability and social comprehension/judgement.
Once
we built the Emode IQ test, Emode performed a large-scale study to compare
the results of people who had taken both the Emode IQ test and the established
Shipley Institute of Living Scale (by Walter C. Shipley). The Shipley test
has been used for more than 50 years to assess facets of intelligence. We
did this to ensure that the way we constructed our test would yield reliable
and valid IQ results.
We used scores calculated by the Shipley test as a basis for calibrating
Emode's IQ test. That ensured a high association between the two tests and,
because of that, the validity of our IQ scores. In fact, the Emode IQ test
is highly reliable—the Chronbach's alpha is .81. In other words, the questions
on Emode's IQ test are internally consistent and they all measure intelligence
accurately.
In the past, researchers who have constructed IQ tests have discovered additional
patterns that relate to the categories of questions a particular test-taker
answered correctly — categories such as mathematical, visual, verbal and
logical. When these researchers analyzed peoples' results, they found that,
for instance, a test-taker might have answered the math-oriented and verbal
questions correctly, yet tended to answer the logical questions incorrectly.
From such patterns, experts were able to define some internal scales of intelligence
to the overall IQ test. Thus, using those internal scales, they could offer
an actual IQ score, such as 105, as well as a measurement of how well the
test-taker did within each question category.
After 1 million people took the Emode IQ test, we ran what is called
a "factor analysis" on the answers those people gave. This statistical analysis
identified the similarity between groups of questions in our test. The analysis
demonstrated that this particular IQ test accurately measured four underlying
dimensions of intelligence: mathematical, visual-spatial, linguistic and
logical.
Each of the questions in the Emode IQ test relates to one dimension
of intelligence. How reliable are these dimensions? Well, for the scientists
and statisticians out there, their reliability coefficients were .85, .84,
.81 and .50, respectively. The gist of all of that is that Emode's scales
of intelligence are highly valid and we can accurately tell you how high
you scored on each of those scales relative to the other test-takers—thus
yielding an accurate intellectual type. |
 |









 |
 |
Armstrong, T. (1993). 7 Kinds of Smart: Identifying and Developing Your Many Intelligences. NY: Plume (The Penguin Group).
Bonthous, J. (1995). "Understanding intelligence across cultures." Competitive Intelligence Review, Summer/Fall: 12-19.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
(10th Anniversary Edition). NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1992). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H.. (1985). The Mind's New Science. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. and Hatch, T. (1989). "Multiple Intelligences Go to
School: Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences."
Educational Researcher 18(8): 4-9.
Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M.L., and Wake, W.K. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple Perspectives. NY: Harcourt, Brace.
Horn, J.L. (1989). "Cognitive diversity: A framework for learning." Pp. 61-116 in P.L.
Ackerman, R.J. Sternberg, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and Individual
differences: Advances in theory and research. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and
Co.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). "How much can we boost I.Q. and scholastic achievement?" Harvard Educational Review 39:1-123.
Lohman, D.F. (1989). "Human intelligence: An introduction to advances
in theory and research." Review of Educational Research 59(4):333-374.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody,
N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg,
R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American
Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). "Intelligence is the best
predictor of job performance." Current Directions in Psychological Science
1:86-89.
Robbins, D. (1996). The Philosophy of Intelligence: An Outline of Theories. Psychology Department, University of Calgary.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). "Human abilities." Annual Review of Psychology 49:479-502.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath,
J. A. (1995). "Testing common sense." American Psychologist 50:912-927.
Sternberg, R.J. (1991). "Death, taxes, and bad intelligence tests." Intelligence 15(3):257-269.
Sternberg, R.J. (1992). "Ability tests, measurements, and markets." Journal of Educational Psychology 84(2):134-140.
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |